Pixelpost

Authentic Photoblog Flavour


Go Back   Pixelpost Forum > MISCELLANEOUS > Photo and Website Critique

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-31-2005, 01:55 PM
Danyarnos Offline
pp veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bolton, England.
Posts: 58
One Man Band

http://www.aidemedia.co.uk/photoblog...p?showimage=50

Comments Welcome, I had trouble exposing this shot right, but I'm fairly happy with the results.
__________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸»«¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø ¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸»«¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø ¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸

Photoblog: http://www.aidemedia.co.uk/photoblog
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2005, 02:11 PM
skennedy1217's Avatar
skennedy1217 Offline
pp veteran
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 71
I like the composition...one man band in a crowd of people...there's just something amusing about it. I would have maybe tried to take it when there were not any pedestrians so close on the opposite side of the one man band. I know this is hard to do on a crowded street, but the lady in the white shirt and jeans is slightly distracting.

Have you seen your site in Firefox? Everything is pushed to the right. Looks great in IE6, though.

On an unrelated note, nice to see your photos from the U2 concert. I saw them in Philadelphia back in the spring and was too chicken to take a camera. I ended up in the ellipse right in front of the stage. I'm still kicking myself about it. I'm seeing them again in December, but will be seated instead of in the General Admission section. So unless I bring the DSLR and a tele lens, I won't get any close-ups like I could have had.
__________________
www.chromaticus.net
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2005, 02:27 PM
blinking8s's Avatar
blinking8s+ Offline
über loafer
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 3,428
Send a message via ICQ to blinking8s Send a message via AIM to blinking8s Send a message via MSN to blinking8s Send a message via Skype™ to blinking8s
i kinda dig it, a little more DOF or something to seperate him from the BG a tad bit more might have worked better...and then I want a follow up showing his face though, i'd shoot that dude for a good 30 minutes if i EVER saw that around here...haha
__________________
i should say more clever stuff
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2005, 02:42 PM
Danyarnos Offline
pp veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bolton, England.
Posts: 58
I think your right about the lady being slightly distracting, I could probably do something about that in PS.

I haven't seen it in Firefox I'm going to have a look now, thanks for that.

U2 was the gig of the year for me, especially being on holiday on the Cote d'Azur.

Blinking8s: your right and I have already added a little lens blur, but maybe a couple of percent more would've been better, and I am going to post another one of him today.

stay tuned...
__________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸»«¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø ¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸»«¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø ¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸

Photoblog: http://www.aidemedia.co.uk/photoblog
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2005, 02:59 PM
blinking8s's Avatar
blinking8s+ Offline
über loafer
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 3,428
Send a message via ICQ to blinking8s Send a message via AIM to blinking8s Send a message via MSN to blinking8s Send a message via Skype™ to blinking8s
as a "student-photojournalist" i try to stay pretty clear of over processing anything, then it just becomes a lie to a degree. But I also do a lot of design work and photoshop the heck outta stuff, so year...it's really you're call...but I just normally accept that I messed up and should have composed different. It's a live and learn process.
__________________
i should say more clever stuff
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2005, 03:06 PM
Danyarnos Offline
pp veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bolton, England.
Posts: 58
why does it become a lie? or accept that I messed up? just because I didn't do the DoF the way I would've liked when I took the picture, doesn't mean I can't deal with it later to recreate what I actually wanted to capture.

Its all part of the "digital dark room"...


I must admit I don't like it when people apply allsorts of filters in photoshop, but a bit of blur, burn, dodge, USM, never hurt anyone
__________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸»«¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø ¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸»«¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø ¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸

Photoblog: http://www.aidemedia.co.uk/photoblog
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-31-2005, 03:09 PM
blinking8s's Avatar
blinking8s+ Offline
über loafer
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 3,428
Send a message via ICQ to blinking8s Send a message via AIM to blinking8s Send a message via MSN to blinking8s Send a message via Skype™ to blinking8s
it's a strange world of journalism ethics, i can't really explain it...haha
__________________
i should say more clever stuff
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-31-2005, 03:21 PM
garethm Offline
forum loafer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 15
Ansel Adams said "The negative is comparable to the composer's score and the print to its performance. Each performance differs in subtle ways."

Photography involves a process of decision-making; selection and rejection of alternatives. I choose a wide aperture to reduce the depth of field, eliminating the background. I choose to print on hard paper, or to cross-process, or a slow shutter speed, or to dodge and burn in the darkroom. None of these things are regarded as illegitimate activities. What, then, is the difference between them and achieving similar results in photoshop?

Blatantly changing the material contents of an image by pasting into it elements from a completely different photograph is one thing; a bit of selective blurring is quite another. As a photojournalism student, you need to be clear on your philosophy
__________________
--
http://www.marlow.org.uk/pblog/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-31-2005, 03:28 PM
nephoto's Avatar
nephoto Offline
pixelpost guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 102
I think what Blinking8's is trying to say is that people tend to begin to rely more on the fact that they can digitally post process pictures to look how they had intended rather than learning how to take the picture 'in camera', essentially becoming a better photographer. As students that is our goal, seeing as how we don't want to be sitting at the computer after every shoot for extended periods of time to make the picture look how we had intended to do in the first place, rather just drop and go Neither way is right or wrong, just preference to time management I s'pose.

Besides that though I'm loving this guy as a subject, I have been waiting to come across someone like this and have yet to have the pleasure, nice pictures.
__________________
we judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we've already done.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-31-2005, 03:35 PM
Danyarnos Offline
pp veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bolton, England.
Posts: 58
I see what your saying, and am definately in it to improve my skills. What I will say is in my opinion some photo's I take, I'm completely happy with and don't do much to them. Sometimes I take a photo and get back to my computer and see that its very close to being a great photo. Rather than binning it, I do a bit of tweaking, and hey presto the "One Man Band" picture.

So I think sometimes no matter how good you get, theres always room for jello, I mean Post processing
__________________
ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸»«¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø ¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸ ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸»«¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø ¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸

Photoblog: http://www.aidemedia.co.uk/photoblog
Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Style Design: d3 designs