|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
First Timer
Hello,
Can someone critique my shots and let me know what they think. This is my first try with a photoblog, i just got it up Saturday. Thanks Aaron www.aaronrosa.com |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting shots. You don't seem to have an archive link, or maybe I am missing it. And I find the grey colour of the comments hard to read on a black background.
__________________
Jeremy |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
No archive yet, sorry about the comment section, totally new to this. These are the first images that I have ever posted. The only other camera I have ever owned is 2.1 megapixel. I am slowly learning more each day. Thanks for the feedback, it all helps.
www.aaronrosa.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
some well composed pictures in there, but they are very boring.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
less boring pix
Hey,
I think you have an eye for picking out interesting subjects, not boring at all, but look for ways to vary your composition and point of view to see these things in a new way. For example your subject is centered in the middle of the frame in every shot I looked at. Once you pick your subject, spend a lot of time looking around it (and walking around) and see how you can include elements of the environment into the composition. Sometimes the most satisfying composition leave the "subject barely in the frame at all, which makes me wonder what the idea of "subject" really means, but that's a whole other conversation I suppose. Anyhow. Great work. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I found the subject matter you've chosen to photograph generic and uninspired. Most of the images are very clean and technically good, but lacking character and individuality. For me, a picture of a beach or a flower doesn't evoke an emotional reaction. Flicking through your images felt a bit like looking through a stock site. Maybe if you disregard the notion of what you think a good photograph should look like and tried to capture images that don't appear as filler for photo frames then something more unique may develop. The images may also become more interesting if you gave them some context by writing a bit about where they were taken, or the idea behind the image. Probably not very constructive either. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with a few comments already made on the layout - gray on black is hard to read. :-)
I like a lot of your shots - in fact I've taken a number of very similar shots (maybe they're the types of shots a lot of people take, or maybe it's just a sort of subgroup of people that seem attracted to those types of shots? eh - anyway...) - So obviously I think you're picking interesting subjects. Thoughts on how to move forward (nothing that hasn't been said before, I'm sure...) - get up closer on some of your subjects - get really close if you can sometimes, don't be afraid to not show the whole object... look at things from different perspectives, maybe things people won't expect. If I find something interesting - I try to take some long shots and some close ones - sometimes what I think works at the time - doesn't, and the other shots do... Some of those similar shots (not saying these are better by any means... just similar subjects...) chicken - close shot: http://www.johei.com/gallery/random2003/Dsc03658 birds on a wire: http://www.foundrysite.com/subterra/subterra.pdf ...sorry that that's a pdf doc... birds are on pages 3 and 4. wet flower: http://www.johei.com/gallery/clemati...146_800?full=1 landscape: http://www.johei.com/gallery/random2...llinois?full=1 |
| Post Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|